Sunday, 25 March 2018

New Photo Story! New Togging Challenges! More on the Vlogging Thing! MORE!!!!! (I think this is gonna be a long one...)

Busy Busy Busy!

And the problem is I’ve been busy with stuff that has nothing to do with photography. I haven’t actually been able to take my gear out for some serious photography in nearly a month, so I haven’t had anything to write about, photography-wise, for about as long. But no longer! This week has been all about the togging, so I can finally write stuff. Woo to the Hoo. But where to start?

I guess I’ll start with the hiking gear and the problems I’m having with it.

The Hiking Gear and the Problems I’m Having with It

When I was in the army they taught us how to pack our kit so we had everything we would need for a long time out bush in a relatively small bag (2 weeks worth of gear in a 50L bag). And I can still do that... sorta. 

Y’See, when I was in the army I could fit in the army sleeping bags, curled up all snug in my customary foetal sleeping position. But as I have grown older my body has filled out more, my shoulders have broadened and I just don’t fit anymore. I’ve got an army sleeping bag right now and being in it is like wearing a sleeveless wetsuit! Fortunately, my super-secret contact bought me a king size Weisshorn Camping Thermal Sleeping Bag for Christmas. I’ve tested it out and it’s great! I fit in it comfortably, it’s warm, soft and comparatively light. But it is a bit bigger, so it does take up a bit more space in the old pack. Not too much, but more than the ‘wetsuit’ option mentioned above.

Then there’s the problem of getting older. I’ve done a whole lot of dumb stuff in my life, the result of which being a body that is pretty much all aches or pains. So I need a comfy little camping mattress to ease my pains so I can get to sleep, and the hard foam camp roll yoga-mat-lookin’ thing just ain’t gonna cut it anymore. I bought a flocked single air mattress, and it is ever so comfy, but it
needs a pump to inflate it (huge freakin’ valve opening – look at it!), making the whole kit nearly as bulky as the sleeping bag, so that ain’t gonna cut it for hiking excursions. So that’s two bulky items; one I can cope with (sleeping bag) and one I need a solution for (mattress).

Then there’s the big one – the camera gear. Right now I don’t have a lot of camera gear and none of it is extremely bulky but it’s still too bulky for my backpacks, either of them, when the packs are loaded with camping gear. Part of the problem comes from the fact that my gear has to travel in a bag so that, once I reach my camping site, I can grab my gear and set off in search of compositions. I can go with the solution Thomas Heaton uses (hopefully I can get him to read this and offer me some advice!), that being a camera bag liner in the pack, but then how do I carry the gear on the searches? He never really shows that in his ‘what’s in my bag’ videos. Not that I’ve noticed, anyway.

I think the only solution is going to be another backpack. But this time I know exactly what I need from a pack and can go into it informed. So which pack am I looking at?

Caribee Jet Pack Travel Pack – The 75L version of this one seems the most logical choice. It
will give me plenty of storage space for my camping gear, external straps upon which I can fix things like my tent, my tripod and my hiking poles, and most importantly, it comes with a zip-attached day pack that I can build a camera bag liner for using tough polyester fabric and that camp roll mattress thing that is otherwise useless. The only problem I’ll be left with then is what to sleep on! Do any of you have some suggestions for me on this one?



So that’s the hiking thing. Next I suppose I should go on to my new project.

My New Project

So my Q-West Gallery project is suffering from an acute case of bad timing, meaning I just can’t get those people in position that I need in position when I’m in position to get the final few photos I need to start building the final presentation (that sentence should give you an idea of the complexity I’m dealing with!). The problem, I suppose, comes from the fact that all the little duckies I need to get in a row are in Queenstown, 154km’s away from where I am in Somerset. This is starting to get frustrating so, rather than just twiddling my thumbs, I am starting research on a new project.

This new story, Heritage in Decline, will look at abandoned buildings, factories, farming equipment and towns (yeah, Tassie has ghost towns!WOOHOO!!!) and ask the question, “What do we lose if we lose these places?”

By that I mean, what can we learn about the building, factory, town, etc that might expand our knowledge about the farm, the workers, the people that occupied these decaying spaces? I am hoping to stimulate an interest in the microhistory of Tasmania, and the rest of the world really. Why? Because we have enough books talking about the big players in the big events in history. We can easily lay our hands on a hundred books about World War II and another hundred about why the first hundred are wrong. But how many books are there about the challenges of farming central Tasmania in the 19th or early 20th centuries? What do we know about the life experiences of a mother living in Pillinger in 1890? I think a photo story presenting the right view may just provide the stimulation I’m aiming for. Whether I can provide that right view is another question, one that I will need to answer before I decide whether or not to go ahead with it.

 So I’m researching locations to scout, searching for old buildings with the character and level of decay I’m looking for, and cruising the back roads in search of old buildings I can practice on. I’ll keep you up to date on this one if you are interested, so let me know! And let me know if you have done something like this yourself. What sort of problems did you face? What sort of problems do you think I’ll face?

If I decide to go ahead with this project, I’m thinking that might actually give me enough fodder to justify the purchase of a vlogging kit. I guess I’ll cover that next.

Vlogging Kit

Gear time! I do love gear time.

So what am I looking at? Well camera-wise I want to go compact, durable, portable and easy to use. There are a lot of options out there, but here are the ones I’m thinking of, and why I’m thinking of them:

DJI Osmo+ - This comes with the Zenmuse x3 Zoom 4k camera, has a minimum focusing distance of 50cm and comes attached to an intelligent gimbal system, all which weighs in at less than 500g (corrections welcome – I’m not sure of my numbers here). This makes it perfect for stuffing into my hiking pack (if I can figure that problem out) for vlogging some middle-of-nowhere building photography. The problem is I have no idea how the audio is out of these things, so...



Panasonic Lumix G7 – This seems to be TCSTV’s go-to suggestion for vloggers, and I can see why. It’s a well priced 4k camera with a micro four thirds sensor, a good range of lens options available and a flippy-out selfie/vlogging rear display. And it’s small. A G7 with the Panasonic 14mm F/2.5 wide prime weighs in at only 465g. That’s a nice small kit that I could carry in a pocket. Once again, though, I have to ask ‘how’s the audio?’ And then there’s the lack of the gimbal that makes the Osmo+ so attractive. And there’s also this:



Canon EOS M50 – This thing really gives the G7 a run for its money! It offers the tried and tested sensor from the 80D, a flippy-out rear display like the G7’s, 4k video and Canon’s Dual Pixel AF, which is apparently god’s gift to vlogging! But you can’t have Dual Pixel AF with 4k, which messes with my head a little. I have no idea what Canon was thinking there, but in my opinion they need to think again. Still, Dual Pixel AF at 1080 is still fantastic, and might be enough to draw me away from the G7. At 487g with the Canon 22mm f/2 it’s not that much heavier that the G7, but it is a fair bit pricier here in Oz. Again, cameras like this and the others I’ve mentioned don’t have the best reputation for audio, so let’s address that now.

Audio Kit

I’ve been thinking about audio quite a bit since I started thinking vlogging. I wear a hearing aid in my left ear, on those occasions when it works and my ear isn’t blocked, so I like good clear audio. I am also on a limited income (I may have mentioned) so when I look at gear I have to look at quality of the product for the price being asked. For these reasons I am thinking about these combinations:

Zoom H1N Digital Recorder – If I find myself going with the Osmo+ I’m thinking external audio is going to be easiest, and Zoom seems to be the buzzword for external audio, so the Zoom H1 suggests itself. Reasonable price, compact, good reputation for audio. I’d likely team it with a Rode Pinmic so I can get the microphone right up near my mouth and minimise the ambient noise factor.

 
Mirrorless Kit -
 If I go mirrorless, I’m thinking the Saramonic SR-PAX1 2-Channel Mixer with Preamp will give me some good audio and I’ll mate it with a Rode VideoMic. Why Saramonic? Their gear is priced to fit my budget and, from what I’ve seen, heard and read in reviews, they provide great audio for the price. But I won’t know for sure until I actually get hold of the stuff and try it out. Why Rode? I like my little Rode SmartLav+, so I think I’ll like the VideoMic. Sometimes I just go with my gut.

Now, there is a final kit option that I have to consider, and in considering it I have to say it looks like a sensible choice. I’m thinking about my Nikon D3200 in manual focus using hyper-focal distance to keep myself from getting all blurry, teamed with the mirrorless audio kit above. 



There are pro’s and con’s to this option:
PROS
CONS
I already own the camera and lens, so I’m not spending big
Nikon’s autofocus in video mode is reputedly awful
I already know the camera and can start learning the video functions now
No 4k, only 1080 or less
Light enough for me to vlog with
Much heavier than the other options with my wide lens attached.
Sharp image
No stabilisation on anything but my kit lens

So that’s what’s come about in the last week, and wasn’t it a lot of shite to happen all at once?! Now I know you don’t like commenting, and most of you are probably bots, but if there are any humans reading this and you have experience with hiking or camping, taking photos of abandoned or derelict buildings, or if you know anything about vlogging or audio gear... well... help a blogger out?

Which of these have you done?

What camping gear do you use?

What vlogging gear do you use?

What audio gear do you recommend?

Do you have a preferred backpack for hiking? What is it and why do you like it? 

As always, I hope you enjoyed the read! If you did, give me some feedback! If you didn’t, give me some feedback! (Get the feeling I’d like some feedback?)

Anyway, I’ve added some new stuff to my portfolio:
And I’m fairly active on:
And I am @BobCartPhoto on Twitter
Ciao!

Thursday, 8 March 2018

Changes to My Photography



Hey!
So, since getting my hands on the Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 I have noticed a fundamental shift in the way I approach my landscape photography. Take a look at this first shot:
This is one of the first landscape shots I took. The colours are nice, the composition is okay... it’s a nice photo, I like it. 
Now have a look at this shot:
This is one of the shots I’ve taken with my Sigma ultra-wide. Do you see anything different? Yeah! I’m paying a hell of a lot more attention to my foreground. There are a number of reasons for this:
1.      With a lens this wide, if you have nothing in the foreground the image just seems to fall flat. For example:
2.      With a foreground element you can create leading lines that guide the eye into the image. It would be nice if there were really interesting things in frame to lead the eye to, but when I’m out practicing there isn’t always something interesting to put in the frame. This is a good photo for demonstrating my point, though, even if it isn’t the best shot I ever took:
3.      If I don’t pay attention to my foreground, all of my foreground, I wind up with some unexpected and unwelcome foreground elements:

I am really enjoying my new lens and I think I’ve figured out where G.A.S. comes from.  You see, I have always enjoyed my photography; I love getting out there and looking for the shot, finding the composition, trying to do something different so that my images will stand out. I don’t know if I’ve done that yet, probably not, but I still love trying! Then came the Sigma 10-20 and, oh my god! Not only am I still enjoying going out and shooting, but I am excited to go out and try new stuff with this new glass! My photography has been reinvigorated by acquiring this new piece of gear. See my point? Get what I’m talking about?
Yup. A new piece of gear injects new life into your photography. But what do you do at the end of the honeymoon period - when you’re comfortable with the lens, you know what it can do and what you can do with it? It’s still a great piece of kit, and it still expands your photography, but the thrill is gone. You need something else to get you excited again.
Solution?
Get more gear! You begin to fall into a cycle; you need new gear and you need it more and more often. You have G.A.S! But this is where being a limited-income photographer comes in handy.
It took me a long time to get my ultra-wide glass and it took a lot of thinking; a lot of considering my lens needs, my life needs and my budget before I decided I could get the lens. Then, with my limited budget, I really needed to consider which lens I should get. I narrowed then range down to four choices. The table below gives you the lenses, their pros and their cons.
 
Lens
Pros
Cons

Nikkor AF-P 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G

Low Price - A$539
Vibration Reduction
Native glass
Low price my arse!*
Variable Aperture

Tamron 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5

Vibration Compensation
Comparatively high price - A$799
Variable Aperture

Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8

Fast constant aperture – f/2.8
No stabilisation
Comparatively high price - A$788

Sigma Lens 10-20mm f/3.5

Fast constant aperture – f/3.5
Cheaper than Tamron &Tokina - A$612
No stabilisation
More expensive than the Nikon – No it ain’t!*

I’m not sure if you noticed – did you see the asterisks in the table? How about the red text? You did? Good! I was afraid I was being a bit too subtle. So what’s my problem? Why is the Nikkor getting the “special” treatment?
The Nikkor has Nikon’s new AF-P autofocus system. The new system uses a pulse drive motor to get focus faster and more precisely than the old AF-S system. Which is great... for some. For others, Like we limited-budget shooters, it means that we are slowly going to run out of new lens options. Why?
Because the new AF-P lenses are not compatible with our older bodies (check out Ken Rockwell’s review of the lens in question for a run-down on compatibility). That means that, if you want to get the Nikkor 10-20mm, you have to buy a new body at the same time. Right now, the best price I can find on a refurbished body (I’m reluctant to go second hand because I’ve done that with other things and yikes!) is A$448 for a Nikon D3400. This means, in turn, that to get a fully functional Nikkor 10-20mm AF-P you have to pay more in the region of A$987. And that’s if there is a refurbished body available. Otherwise you are looking at a minimum of A$1054 for the lens and a new D3400. And, from my perspective, I still wouldn’t be able to use the lens with my loaner D7000.
And it’s just going to get worse as more and more lenses get the new AF-P system. I now find myself having to decide whether to save up for more and better glass or for a new body which will take that new glass. Hmm...
Hang on! I’ll just go with Sigma! The lenses are cheaper, the quality is the same and I can use them with my D3200 and D7000. Sorted!
So... Umm... Bye Bye, Nikon!

I hope you enjoyed the read!
Please check out my portfolio at:
You can also find me at:
And I am @BobCartPhoto on Twitter

Should I frame 1:1?

Hey! ‘Sup, gang? So, any of you who follow me on Facebook or Google+ know that I’ve been experimenting with a square format for my pho...